← Back to All Papers
PAPER V

SIRP

Author: Dan Voulez

Institution: The LogLine Foundation

Version: 1.0.1

Date: February 05, 2026

Thesis: Identity must be routed, not locations. A packet is an accountable artifact when its meaning is content-addressed, signed, and receipted.

Paper V — SIRP: The Network Atom

Secure Intent Routing Protocol

Normative keywords per RFC 2119/8174 (MUST/SHOULD/MAY) apply.

The Story

December 2024. A distributed AI system. A catastrophic failure.

Three agents were supposed to coordinate a complex financial operation. Agent A sent instructions to Agent B. Agent B claimed it never received them. Agent C executed based on what it thought Agent B had decided. The result: $18 million in erroneous trades.

The post-mortem was brutal:

- TCP delivered the packets (probably)

- No proof of delivery existed

- No proof of receipt existed

- Each agent's version of events contradicted the others

- The network was a black box

"We can't prove who said what to whom."

Now imagine a different architecture.

Every message between agents is a Capsule—signed, content-addressed, receipted:


{
  "magic": "0x5199",
  "ver": 1,
  "cid": "b3:7f3a9b2c4d5e6f7a8b9c0d1e2f3a4b5c...",
  "sender_did": "did:logline:agent:A",
  "payload": {
    "kind": "instruction",
    "action": "execute_trade",
    "params": {"symbol": "AAPL", "quantity": 1000}
  },
  "signature": "ed25519:..."
}

When Agent B receives this Capsule, it signs a Delivery Receipt:


{
  "kind": "sirp.receipt.delivery.v1",
  "capsule_cid": "b3:7f3a9b2c...",
  "sender_did": "did:logline:agent:A",
  "receiver_did": "did:logline:agent:B",
  "ts_received": "2024-12-15T14:23:07.847Z",
  "outcome": "DELIVERED",
  "signature": "ed25519:agent_B_key"
}

Agent B cannot later claim it didn't receive the instruction. The receipt exists. The signature is verifiable. The dispute collapses into a hash comparison.

The network becomes an audit trail.

This is SIRP.

I. The Problem

Networks route packets by location. But in a world of accountable agents, location is irrelevant. What matters is:

- Who is speaking?

- What do they intend?

- Can we prove delivery?

Traditional networks provide none of this:

- IP addresses change

- Packets can be forged

- Delivery is best-effort

- Routing leaves no audit trail

When meaning must travel, it must travel as an accountable artifact.

II. The Thesis

**Route by identity, not topology. Receipt every hop. Prove delivery.**

SIRP defines:

1. Capsule — the atomic, signed, content-addressed message

2. Discovery — identity-bound DHT mapping DIDs to endpoints

3. TAL — transport abstraction (UDP, QUIC, WebSocket, TCP)

4. Receipts — cryptographic proof of relay and delivery

SIRP is to the network what the Gate is to execution: nothing meaningful happens without artifacts.

Read Full Paper on GitHub →